I am working with a number of Life Science manufacturing companies that have taken a strategic approach for their manufacturing systems landscape. There is a lot of buzz on this topic in the industry, which makes it that much more interesting but with some challenges. I am generally fond of using a historical perspective and so I decided to do the same for the MES software products in the life science industry. This perspective is just mine and I am sure there are many more that can be given by my peers in the industry – a subtle hint.
So let’s start in the 1980’s, the decade that gave us CIM and a growing awareness about the role that computers play in manufacturing operations. The focus at that time was how computer systems, aka software, can be used to increase efficiencies and manage complexity. In fact computer technology was gaining so much momentum that it was considered a major element in revolutionizing the manufacturing landscape in parallel to the advent of the Lean movement.
This gave birth to quite a few Manufacturing Execution System (MES) product companies in the 1980’s. The 90’s then followed by a massive development and spread of information technology, which is now at the core of everything we do today, not only in manufacturing. Manufacturing operations are becoming so dependent on information that these systems have to be considered at a strategic level. Initially this strategic focus was given to expensive business systems such as ERP however it is becoming evident that other systems, specifically MES, sometime have more impact on the bottom line and should be considered equally strategic.
MES software products evolved in different industries and their roots manifest themselves in both the functionality and the corresponding
MES vendor’s organization. Companies and products that currently serve the Life Science industry generally have their roots in the semi-conductor and electronics industry, and understandably also the Life Science industry itself.
In the industries outside Pharma and Bio-Pharma, MES was introduced to deal with the inherent high level of automation and complexity of the high volume manufacturing process where lowering cost and increasing production throughput were crucial. It was virtually impossible to manually manage the wealth and complexity of information and MES provided a solution. The
MES products were centered on a discrete workflow model that allowed rich modeling capabilities while at the same time allowing customizations. In fact early
MESs were merely toolboxes with a workflow engine, rich data modeling capabilities and tools to custom build user interfaces and business logic.
In the Life Science industry the main driver for introducing
MES was compliance or the electronic batch record and therefore the first such systems provided a “paper-on-glass” solution. The idea was to simply digitize the paper batch records, kind of like the old “overhead projectors”. These systems had simple modeling capabilities and did not allow for much customization. In many cases these “paper-on-glass” systems were supplemented with business logic built as customizations in the automation system. They were commonly implemented in pharmaceutical plants, where the focus on compliance meant low tolerance for customizations and a minimum of change after system were commissioned. This resulted in
MES functionality that was split between the heavily customized automation applications and a “canned” paper-on-glass system to deal with batch records. The Weigh and Dispense feature of these systems was used mostly for traditional pre-weigh activities where the materials are weighed and staged before the process.
In the 2000’s a consolidation started in which some of the independent
MES from vendors where acquired by the major automation vendors and positioned into the life sciences industry. This introduced the rich modeling capabilities that grew out of the semi-conductor and electronics industry to the
Life Sciences industry accustomed to “paper-on-glass” systems. This leaves us today with a wide choice of
MES that are rapidly gaining maturity and sophistication in the form of advanced functionality and interoperability. I think that this maturity is an important factor and plays nicely into the strategic nature of most Manufacturing Systems initiatives that I have been involved in. There is still a long road ahead but I have not been so optimistic about the Manufacturing System domain, in a long time. It certainly looks like there are some very interesting and also challenging years ahead as we work to execute on these strategic initiatives.
2 comments:
Thank you for sharing useful material. I will be back for the more great post. It is my first visit to your blog, and I am very impressed with the articles that you serve. Give adequate knowledge for me. Best Human Resources Software Online.
New prospects to Big Spin are going to get entry to a welcome provide price a lot as} $1,000. The bonus is a massive 200% match of your first deposit of $45 포커 or more. It comes with a low wagering requirement of 30x the mixed bonus and deposit sum.
Post a Comment